On 10/9/06, Pedro Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > does XCP useComponentBinding? > > Is this the Jabberd2.0 new protocolo for external componentes? If > yes, then no. It does not.
Okay, the 'domains' parameter is only used if bind=true. So it's not required to change both instances. > Basically, XCP (at least version 4) requires a static configuration > on the router side. It requires an ID for each component, that > combined with a realm gives you the link name that external > components must use to connect (thats what we use compjid for in > pymsnt and now in the yahoo-transport). The hostname setup is a > different configuration entirely. > > So we need both: compjid for the name used in the initial <stream> > handshake, and then hostname for the official name of the transport. Sort of makes sense. > > (trying to figure out if you need to change the compjid in the > > domains part too) > No. compjid is only used in the initial connection. cool. > BTW, compjid is a valid JID also, so you can assume that stanzas > addressed to it are valid stanzas if you feel like it. It would be > nice that you do so. > <snip/> > The reason to reply to compjid is related to monitoring and > statistics. We use a XMPP-based bot that queries all our services > using compjid to check out stats and availability. The ability to > reply to an iq disco or jabber:iq:register or even ad-hoc commands > over compjid is very useful in those situations, even if you only > allow admin to use that address. Making the compjid respond to iq's probably would be too hard, but I'd prefer to limit it to disco and ad-hoc commands only, i.e. limited to admin _functionality_ only. -- - Norman Rasmussen - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/ From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 9 12:24:29 2006 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Vogel) Date: Mon Oct 9 12:24:44 2006 Subject: [py-transports] PyYIMt is disconnecting randomly In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi! Norman Rasmussen schrieb: > On 10/9/06, Michael Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Norman Rasmussen schrieb: >> > I think this is the Yahoo network dropping the connection. >> >> Yeah I think this could be true. Yahoo isn't really stable and I don't >> mean your transport ;-) When I was using the original client it >> disconnects randomly as well. > > cool, so nothing has regressed :-) Although the C-transport can deal better with this it. It seems to never disconnects. >> I do understand the problem. I think the transport should have some >> reconnect option with a time out option. (Maybe reconnect only 10 times >> then pause for several minutes and so on) > > Mmm, and if you log in with another yahoo client, then it should try at > all :-) My problem lies within Jabber clients that don't show the transports like iChat. In iChat I can't log off/log on the transport. I know that iChat isn't a very good jabber client - but it is looking cool so I'm using it from time to time ;-) Michael -- "The Macintosh may only have 10% of the market, but it is clearly the top 10%" - Douglas Adams 1952-2001
