Norman Rasmussen wrote: > On 6/10/07, *Chris Carlin* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > wrote: > > Anyone know what the actual problem is? Is it really that all of these > clients were doing something against spec? > > It seems kind of funny that more than one client would get such a > fundamental feature wrong... > > > The feature is pretty new. Additionally there are two conflicting > specs on how to implement it. (XEP-0172 User Nickname and XEP-0144 > Roster Item Exchange versus JEP-01xx Roster Subscription Synchronization) >
Hmm this is interesting, since ejabberd does not support these. So would the clients be able to support them anyway? regards, Patrick > Pandion is too old to implement the new spec, so that's not a good > client to test with, unless you patched it. I can't really speak for > Miranda, but generally multi-protocol clients don't have great xmpp > implementations. The Psi betas are pretty up-to-date with the new > spec, so I expect them to work much better. > > Note: that PyMSNt doesn't implement the new spec, so it doesn't really > work with anything. Oddly enough PyYIMt seems to implement at least > the new spec which surprised me when I saw it. > > -- > - Norman Rasmussen > - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > - Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > py-transports mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports > _______________________________________________ py-transports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.modevia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-transports
