On Thursday 01 December 2011 00:27:49 Richard Jones wrote: > On 1 December 2011 10:07, Carl Karsten <c...@personnelware.com> wrote: > > They are not needed for legitimate use. > > I respectfully disagree. It's significantly easier to promote: > > j.mp/mpug > > than > > wiki.python.org/moin/MelbournePUG
That may be the case, but *on* the Wiki, there's absolutely no reason why people can't use full URLs referring to the actual resource in question (but see my remarks below). The reason why I disallowed shortened URLs is that it's easy for people to post spam links and there be absolutely no initial indication that this is what they are. I certainly don't feel like checking random links to who-knows-where just because people don't want to be transparent about where they are linking to. I believe that such links primarily benefit spammers/scammers/tricksters (who don't want people to see where they are going) and people using Twitter (who are constrained by whichever architectural limitation that service still has), along with people needing to promote an easy-to-remember URL by word of mouth or on physical objects, potentially in that order. I accept that from trustworthy people like yourself, the promotional benefit outweighs the "I feel lucky" part of the experience that comes from using these URLs, but the balance is different when random people on the Internet are posting them to one's site. It is unfortunate if people don't get a nice error message if their edits are disallowed, but I am willing to improve that (without telling spammers how to defeat anti-spam mechanisms) if it would be appreciated - the "internal server error" probably shouldn't happen, and that may be fixed somehow by a review of the configuration. If you think that trusted users shouldn't be prevented from using shortened URLs that are mentioned for promotional purposes, say, then I am also willing to work towards a solution. This isn't empty rhetoric - I've already developed things like edit approval functionality for Moin, even though I doubt that it will ever be deployed because of cries of censorship or general inconvenience, just so that I have something to offer if/when people start to say that policing Wikis is too much work - so if you think that improvement is needed, I am prepared to spend some time making that improvement. I am sorry for the inconvenience caused, but please understand the motivation for eliminating what could easily be a source of significant additional work for those of us who volunteer to maintain this resource. Paul P.S. I also find it interesting that a bunch of people happily used domains leased from a now-defunct North African regime (some of whom walked the tightrope more happily than others, though) without any second thought, but that's a separate concern. Personally, I never gave it much thought myself, but then I largely ignored what the Web 2.0 crowd were doing until someone in the Mercurial community raised the matter in the context of mailing list messages. _______________________________________________ pydotorg-www mailing list pydotorg-www@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www