Le mardi 19 mars 2013 à 08:44 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit : > On 19.03.2013 00:27, Noah Kantrowitz wrote: > > > > On Mar 18, 2013, at 4:23 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > > > >> Noah Kantrowitz wrote: > >>> As part of the PyCon sprints I would like to move python.org off dinsdale > >>> to a VM at OSL. Due to the build system being tied to SVN, I'll also > >>> migrate that service on the same VM. Do any SVN repos other than www/ > >>> need to remain available? This would require at least some period of not > >>> changing the website, probably a few hours, but I don't think that would > >>> be a problem. This is mostly a legacy move so I'm not going to clean it > >>> up much, we'll have a new site soon enough. > >> > >> The repos with public interfaces: > >> > >> http://svn.python.org/view/ > >> > >> will need to remain available to keep old links in e.g. > >> bug reports working. > > > > Okay, thats just a single repo ("projects") which is the default one. The > > packages repo is also visible but I'm okay with breaking that given how > > most code has been removed in the current trunk and links are rare (thats > > the old home for the PyPI code and related stuffs). Are we okay with that > > projects repo being full read-only? > > Looking at the page, there are some checkins which are only > a few months old, so I'm not sure whether those can be > made read-only, e.g. external/ or sandbox/
external/ holds snapshots of 3rd-party libs (OpenSSL, etc.) that are used for e.g. Windows builds and doc builds. OTOH, "old links in bug reports" don't need SVN to work, they are mapped onto a conversion Web service in hg.python.org: e.g. http://hg.python.org/lookup/r12345 Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ pydotorg-www mailing list pydotorg-www@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www
