On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Paul Boddie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 19. November 2013 15.58.15 M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> On 19.11.2013 15:38, Alexandro Colorado wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:29 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 19.11.2013 14:46, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> >>> wiki.python.org doesn't allow the word "hardcore" in contents, >> >>> which is a bad filter choice, because, well, some talks about >> >>> Python internals are hardcore for the most users out there. >> >>> >> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardcore >> >>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hardcore >> >> >> >> I've made the filter more selective. > > Of course, the need to use "hardcore" frequently in a reference like the > Python Wiki is somewhat debatable. :-)
Well, I guess who writes the most - wins. =) There is still a long way to go before Python Wiki can experience Wikipedia-like edit wars. > what occurs when no such measures are in place. I would argue that anti-spam > measures need to be a bit more varied these days, though, and I've written > about that on this list in the recent past, I believe. MoinMoin is not interesting. Everybody is using MediaWiki. Is there anything else, more advanced on the horizon? _______________________________________________ pydotorg-www mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www
