Yes, sure, Mats. This is actually my first time as a wiki editor so I’m still new to the workflow. Will send an update when I get time!
> Le 11 févr. 2019 à 02:09, Mats Wichmann <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> On 2/10/19 4:01 PM, Florimond Manca wrote: >> I just made the change, thanks! >> >> I was wondering — how relevant would it be to create a separate section for >> asynchronous frameworks? >> >> There is actually quite a few of them. Some are in the list already (Quart, >> Sanic, and now Bocadillo) and some not yet (Starlette, Responder, Vibora, >> Japronto, etc.). >> >> Perhaps it would be better to set them apart in a section called « >> Asynchronous frameworks » or similar. I’m not sure whether there should be a >> distinction between fullstack/non-fullstack since all existing async >> frameworks are quite « micro ». > > Given the "you're either in the non-async world or you're in the async > world" nature exposed by your first point, why don't you just go for it? > It's a wiki, if people hate it it can just be changed again. > > Less clear on fullstack/non-fullstack distinction, maybe others have > opinions? (or you could elaborate further?) _______________________________________________ pydotorg-www mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www
