Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Aug 8, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Kris Schnee wrote:
I'm interested in trying OpenGL again with that sample code just
posted, but isn't using PyOpenGL now a problem considering that it
seems to require NumPy rather than Numeric, and that NumPy blatantly
withholds its documentation?
Since when does PyOpenGL require NumPy? The version I see is from Jan
2005, about a year before NumPy even existed (under that name as its own
project).
The answer to your question is most definitely "No." because normal use
involves just built-in types... but did PyOpenGL move away from
sourceforge, or is your question simply not based on reality?
It could be, but I was looking here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5988
And saw "PyOpenGL-2.0.2.01.py2.3-numpy23.exe" (and "py2.4") presented as
what seemed to be the most recent distribution.
Kris