Yes, sorry I thought that LGPL was a derivate from GPL 2008/5/22 James Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> LGPL is different than GPL. > > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 01:38:15AM +0200, OsKaR wrote: > > I'm not an licesnse expert, like you, but I think (or maybe I read it > > somewhere) that if you use something with GPL license all the > derivated > > works would be GPL too, however the best idea is to ask a really > expert. > > > > 2008/5/21 Nathan Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > I would like to include a quick reference to pygame functions in an > > appendix of my book. Would it be permissible to use the > documentation > > of pygame for this (reformatted and possibly reorganized)? > > > > It appears the documentation is LGPL. The source code of the > appendix > > would appear on the book's website (LaTeX source). The entire book > > would not be LGPL. Some chapters will appear for free on the > website, > > others will not. I think this would be OK, but I'm not a license > > expert. Any thoughts? Apart from legalities, would that be > > appropriate? > > -- > > Nathan Whitehead > > deadpixelpress.com >
