On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Richard and I have been working on setting up a web site > for the Pyggy Awards, and it's very nearly ready to go! > > In case you've forgotten, the Pyggy Awards is going to be > a showcase event for games based on a previous PyWeek entry. > If you want to polish one of your PyWeek games and have > somewhere to show off the result, this is it. > > The Pyggy Awards will be run in a very similar way to > the PyWeek competition, with the following differences: > > * You can start working immediately, or even in the past, > i.e. any further work you've already done on an existing > PyWeek entry is eligible. > > * Any library code can be used, as long as it's open > source. > > The only thing remaining to be decided is the dates for > the judging period. The possibilities are: > > a) Early December, probably the first 2 weeks. > > b) Some time in February or March next year. > > Option (b) obviously allows more coding time, but the > next PyWeek is going to be in early April, so it wouldn't > leave much time for people to recover their energy. > > So I'm asking for feedback on this -- what would you > prefer? More time, or more breathing space before the > next PyWeek? > > -- > Greg > I think december is better, but can use either. Greg, in your response to Charlie you seem to _allow_ older games, but the page you point in the first post tells _previus pyweek_ . Update the page ? Glad libraries restriction dropped, this will allow to grow libraries along the game refactor. -- claxo