On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Enrico Kochon <ekoc...@uni-osnabrueck.de>wrote:
> René Dudfield schrieb: > > I think the version field can be used for this. > > > > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Enrico Kochon < > ekoc...@uni-osnabrueck.de>wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> ist www.pygame.org still under active development? Does anybody know > who > >> is responsible? Is it Pete Shinners? > >> http://www.pygame.org/wiki/todo mentions planned development tasks like > >> a ranking system and so on. > >> > >> I would like to add one feature to the wishlist: a flag concerning the > >> readiness of a game. > >> There are so many games, thats great, but it is very complicated to find > >> games which are developed far enough to be really playable. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Enrico > >> > > > > Hi, > > yes the version field should be enough. Thus, my featurerequest was > slightly incorrect: I ought to wish it was possible to search projects > with a certain version. > Netherless, the field version is free text, a version numbering system, > or good default text choices (alpha, beta, release) are not given. > > By the way: there is a promising site http://pygameweb.no-ip.org/, what > is this all about? Will it replace the offical pygame.org? > > Regards, > Enrico > Yeah, I think some sort of search page using the version number would be cool. Searches where you can select >= 1, beta, alpha etc might be useful. cu.
