On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:05 PM, René Dudfield <ren...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > I've started on a migration plan for bitbucket. If anyone has any > feedback, please let me know :) > About issues: A problem I have seen in other migrations was : issues text refers to some svn version, say r1054 Before migration with 'r1054' you know how to navigate the repo html view to the relevant check-in info, After migration to hg, the repo html view uses hashes to identify that particular commit / state, say '252e9c8091cc' , so you don't know where to look. So, i don't know how this have been better handled in other migrations, but perhaps the migration could generate a table 'svn revision' -> 'hash hg repo default' and put that in a page. That page can later be embellished with search and what not, but you must have the info to begin with. -- claudio
