I have not used either the original API nor yours, so this suggestion may
be off base, but if they're going to be immutable, why not subclass
collections.namedtuple("Vector2", "x y"), and get a few handy methods
defined for free?-Christopher On Wed Oct 29 2014 at 7:41:54 PM Greg Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > Lorenz Quack wrote: > > > * you cannot access the components x/y/z directly... > > use ... new accessor methods x()/y()/z() > > Is this change really necessary? It will be a big backward > step for code readability. > > There shouldn't be any reason you can't provide read-only > access using attribute notation. > > -- > Greg >
