Yikes! who's gonna pay the Amazon bill? On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Paul Vincent Craven <p...@cravenfamily.com> wrote:
> If most of the site is static, then I think Django would be overkill. The > static portion of the site can easily be deployed via Amazon S3/CloudFront > and then we'd not have to maintain a server. > > Paul Vincent Craven > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Charles Cossé <cco...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Thomas Kluyver <tak...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> So far, I think the proposals for the static information part of the >>> site are Nikola (a static site generator oriented around blogs) and Sphinx >>> (oriented around docs). Both are written in Python. Does anyone want to >>> make the case for any other system? >>> >>> >> Can Django factor-in there? I guess it would reside underneathe the >> other pkgs ... but might as well run Python through-and-through imho. >> >> > -- Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/charles-cosse> | E-Learning <http://www.asymptopia.org>
