One of the criteria for inclusion is: "The software is the subject of instruction at multiple grade schools, high schools, universities or post-graduate programs. This criterion does not apply to software merely used in instruction."
I'd be amazed if pyglet isn't being taught in some CS courses at university level. Maybe this is the thing to chase down. The package I write (www.psychopy.org) is dependent on pyglet and does have a wikipedia entry that isn't currently debated (it was once before but that has been resolved). I did write a couple of articles about it for scientific journals though and the 2nd one explicitly mentioned its dependence on pyglet: Peirce JW (2009) Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Front. Neuroinform. 2:10. doi:10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008 I would imagine there are other packages have similar dependence and articles mentioning it. They might also fall foul of mentioning but not being /about/ pyglet. I do think having a new release would help to prevent (incorrect) claims that it's abandonware though. There are plenty of additions and fixes that could do with being put out there. The fact that they exist in the repository isn't enough. For example, I have to assume that PsychoPy's user base only has access to the latest /released/ version, so I'm stuck at that version. Jon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en.
