That would seem to be unpythonic as it contradicts the zen of python "explicit is better than implicit" On 10 Mar 2015 08:05, "Brandon Keith Biggs" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > I am wondering if there is a way to make the window and app more implicit > in pyglet? Something like: > import pyglet > my_app = pyglet.app() #is the window, just under the name of app > my_app.run() > > or: > import pyglet > window = pyglet.window.Window() > pyglet.app.window = window > pyglet.app.run() > > As it is right now, it is not pythonic at all and I am wondering if there > was a good reason for this? Also, is there a way to make it more implicit? > If not, I can create a wrapper class over it to make it more pythonic, but > I would rather not... > thanks, > > -- > Brandon Keith Biggs <http://www.brandonkeithbiggs.com/> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pyglet-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
