+1 to py.test , nice library On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Rob <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > As with a lot of functionality in Python, there is no need to create > yourself what has already been created by others. That's why I am > considering using one of the other test frameworks that give me this > functionality for free. Would anybody be against using eg py.test for > running the tests? I will of course include it in the extlibs so batteries > are included ;-). > > Rob > > Op donderdag 21 mei 2015 22:09:11 UTC+2 schreef Rob: >> >> The work is still far from finished. I made some of the tests more easy >> to run, both others were just ported as is. So still some work there. >> >> I was already thinking of improving the question. Allowing a clean quit >> from the question is a good one, although capturing ctrl-c and still >> generating the report might also be worth investigating (especially if the >> test hangs without a question). For the tests that determine whether they >> fail based on user input I also want to add a confirmation question. It >> might be that you accidentally did the wrong thing and you want to try >> again. >> >> Also by default logging to file should be enabled. >> >> Rob >> >> Op woensdag 20 mei 2015 06:57:36 UTC+2 schreef claudio canepa: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> For pyglet 1.3.x I've been working on a new test framework >>>> >>> >>> ... >>> >>> The interactive tests seems to flow much better from the POV of 'user >>> testing', thanks for your work. >>> >>> Question: while running the interactive tests I got >>> >>> """ >>> tests.interactive.image.test_buffer_copy >>> (unittest.loader.ModuleImportFailure) . >>> .. ERROR >>> tests.interactive.image.test_buffer_saving >>> (unittest.loader.ModuleImportFailure) >>> ... ERROR >>> """ >>> >>> I wanted to see some details about the error, surely they were captured >>> somewhere. Being late I issued a ctrl-c to quit the test runner, supposing >>> a log would be left behind. No log found. >>> >>> Shouldn't the logging be progressive and be on by default ? >>> >>> And maybe change in the Q&A >>> Passed [Y/n]: >>> to >>> Passed[Y/n](q to quit): >>> >>> to allow a clean exit ? >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pyglet-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
