Hi,

I've fixed a small reference leak in the get/set_property wrappers.

It's also registered as bug #71021.

Regards,

Arjan
Index: pygtk/gobjectmodule.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gnome-python/pygtk/gobjectmodule.c,v
retrieving revision 1.104
diff -u -p -r1.104 gobjectmodule.c
--- pygtk/gobjectmodule.c	2002/07/12 13:50:57	1.104
+++ pygtk/gobjectmodule.c	2002/08/01 13:10:50
@@ -388,14 +388,15 @@ pyg_object_set_property (GObject *object
     py_value = pyg_value_as_pyobject (value, TRUE);
     retval = PyObject_CallMethod(object_wrapper, "do_set_property",
 				 "OO", py_pspec, py_value);
+    Py_DECREF(py_pspec);
+    Py_DECREF(py_value);
+    Py_DECREF(object_wrapper);
     if (retval) {
 	Py_DECREF(retval);
     } else {
 	PyErr_Print();
 	PyErr_Clear();
     }
-    Py_DECREF(py_pspec);
-    Py_DECREF(py_value);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -411,12 +412,13 @@ pyg_object_get_property (GObject *object
     py_pspec = pyg_param_spec_new(pspec);
     retval = PyObject_CallMethod(object_wrapper, "do_get_property",
 				 "O", py_pspec);
+    Py_DECREF(py_pspec);
+    Py_DECREF(object_wrapper);
     if (retval == NULL || pyg_value_from_pyobject(value, retval) < 0) {
 	PyErr_Print();
 	PyErr_Clear();
     }
     Py_XDECREF(retval);
-    Py_DECREF(py_pspec);
 }
 
 static void

Reply via email to