Hi, I've fixed a small reference leak in the get/set_property wrappers.
It's also registered as bug #71021. Regards, Arjan
Index: pygtk/gobjectmodule.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gnome-python/pygtk/gobjectmodule.c,v retrieving revision 1.104 diff -u -p -r1.104 gobjectmodule.c --- pygtk/gobjectmodule.c 2002/07/12 13:50:57 1.104 +++ pygtk/gobjectmodule.c 2002/08/01 13:10:50 @@ -388,14 +388,15 @@ pyg_object_set_property (GObject *object py_value = pyg_value_as_pyobject (value, TRUE); retval = PyObject_CallMethod(object_wrapper, "do_set_property", "OO", py_pspec, py_value); + Py_DECREF(py_pspec); + Py_DECREF(py_value); + Py_DECREF(object_wrapper); if (retval) { Py_DECREF(retval); } else { PyErr_Print(); PyErr_Clear(); } - Py_DECREF(py_pspec); - Py_DECREF(py_value); } static void @@ -411,12 +412,13 @@ pyg_object_get_property (GObject *object py_pspec = pyg_param_spec_new(pspec); retval = PyObject_CallMethod(object_wrapper, "do_get_property", "O", py_pspec); + Py_DECREF(py_pspec); + Py_DECREF(object_wrapper); if (retval == NULL || pyg_value_from_pyobject(value, retval) < 0) { PyErr_Print(); PyErr_Clear(); } Py_XDECREF(retval); - Py_DECREF(py_pspec); } static void