On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 18:06, Christian Reis wrote: > On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 10:02:45AM +0200, Martin Preishuber wrote: > > Since RedHat 8 includes pygtk2 and gnome-python2 per default now I get > > some requests why my eroaster application doesn't work any more ... it > > is a pygtk application ... > > Blame RedHat for not having shipped the changes James and Johan worked > on to allow coexistance of the modules, I'm afraid. I have no idea why > they thought this was a good idea.
damn ... actually I think it's probably a bit too early to generally migrate because I don't know much about the status of other distributions related to inclusion of pygtk2. The only thing I know is that the unstable tree of debian contains pygtk and pygtk2, but not python-gnome2, so I think it's too early for debian [actually I'm using debian, eroaster uses python-gnome stuff so I would have to install python-gnome2 manually ;-)] > > > So is there a good clean way to port pygtk to pygtk2 applications ? How > > much troubles will I have with changed widgets (eroaster includes many > > different of them, pygtk and gnome-python ones) ? Is there any quick > > documentation on porting available ? > > Not really. I encourage you to: > > a) Try the port. It shouldn't be too much work. Use gtk.py as a > reference along with the docs. I had a short look at it ... looks like the gtk widgets are pretty similar except of the Names ... I think this shouldn't be a problem. > b) Update section 2 of the FAQ. :-) > > > Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/ > the FAQ is nice :) I just wondered, why some sections are missing (6 and 15 ;-)) thanks, Martin -- Martin Preishuber - IT Expert, Student, SysAdmin http://www.eclipt.at, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] innovate, v.: To annoy people. _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
