On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 16:21, Roberto Cavada wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was wondering why you chose to develop and use codegen to wrap
> gtk. Since I've got to wrap pure C Object Oriented code into
> pythonian objects and functions, I like to know if I better use
> codegen instead of SWIG (and why).
I think codegen can only wrap GObject's. Whether or not to use codegen
would depend on whether or not your C object oriented code is based on
gobject or not, I guess.
If I'm mistaken, someone please correct me! :)
>
> Fastly looking at FAQ 1.11 ("How do I extend PyGTK"), codegen seems to
> be more complicated to be tuned - doesn't it?
> Anyway, I'm not very familiar with SWIG (typemaps, for example), and
> actually I don't know if it could be even more complicated, or less
> flexible than codegen.
>
> Best regards,
> rob
> _______________________________________________
> pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
> Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
--
Gustavo Jo�o Alves Marques Carneiro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
