On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 03:27:25PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Generic sequence access would allow pygtk to use tuples, lists, arrays, > numarrays, or anything which supports the correct sequence semantics.
I'm +1 for this change, though James might have his reasons as to why not to accept it. I think consistency of the API is something we should *really* aim for. > I asked a question in this vein in October but received no reply at all. > Before I embark upon coding this up, I'd at least like to get some > feedback to the extent of: > > A) Yes, sounds like a good idea. Go to it. > B) No, bad idea. The reason it is a bad idea is XXXXXXX. James almost certainly has an opinion, let's wait for him to voice it. Take care, -- Christian Reis, Senior Engineer, Async Open Source, Brazil. http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 | NMFL _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
