> > Is this GTK 1.2 or 2.x? > Ah, I should have mentioned that this is with Gtk 2.
Take care, Jesse Christian Reis on January 10, 2003 wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:19:04PM -0500, Jesse Pavel wrote: > > > > I've read that timeout functions registered with gtk.timeout_add() > > may be called from a separate thread; but is this true even if I > > This was a rumor that Jon Nelson brought up, and I have yet to see proof > of it. I *think* your approach is safe, and that only the GTK thread > will be used for all GTK operations, no matter what (after all, it *is* > GTK who is driving the mainloop). > > I don't know anything about threads, though: "I did not say this.. I am > not here." (Guild Navigator in Dune) > > > calls--store events in a Queue, from which they would be picked up > > by a timeout handler that I hoped would run in the gtk main thread. > > I wanted to use this design in order to account for setups where > > GTK threading is unavailable or broken. _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
