On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:27:10AM -0500, Doug Quale wrote:
> There are some things we can discuss whether they should be in pygtk.
> For instance, people have considered in the past whether widget
> properties should be attributes. That would allow properties to be
> get and set directly using attribute syntax in addition to using
> get_property() and set_property().
There's actually a bug open for this that was considered for the freeze
but eventually left out; Iņaki wrote the patch that is up at:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81879
jpe, Johan and I have commented on it -- maybe others should chime in
too. The issue I raised was "fear of namespace conflicts" that would be
introduced by this, but I think it's rather minor.
Take care,
--
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3361 2331
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
