On Qua, 2006-08-02 at 17:11 +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:32:29 +0530
> "Baiju M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Hmm...let this not lead to a flame fest.
>
> No, I don't want that either :-) It wasn't my intention to seem
> annoyed! :-)
>
> > All PyGTK users are Python users too, but not all of them are GNOME
> > users.
>
> Yes.
>
> > But without GNOME there is no GTK and so no PyGTK.
>
> Why is that? GTK precedes GNOME.
I won't argue that. But as I said before, pygtk.org hosts information
for not only PyGTK, but also GnomePython, GnomePythonDesktop, and
GnomePythonExtras. And let's not forget PyGTK binds also libglade, a
GNOME library. Therefore:
1- The GNOME logo should be there
2- The Python logo should be there
3- The GTK logo could also be added (the tricolor cube one)
I'm not saying all logos are equally important, but they all deserve
to be there.
The solution might be, as someone suggested, to design a new logo; one
that combines the gtk logo with the python logo would look good IMHO.
Then we could make that logo more prominent, and add the other ones a
bit smaller and more out of the way.
In any case let there be no doubt that PyGTK and GNOME endorse each
other. There seems to be some anti-GNOME feeling that I just don't
understand.
Regards,
--
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The universe is always one step beyond logic
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list pygtk@daa.com.au
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
