On 6/22/07, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/22/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
>
> > so far, my take on the issue is that PyGtk should adapt to that
> > change by not using tooltips->tips_data_list
>
> I have attached a patch to
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449318 that removes access to
> private GtkTooltips struct members from the pygtk bindings. I can't tell
> if this will break any PyGTK apps but I guess that these bindings have
> only been added for the sake of completeness.
>

Thats fine. Can we still please revert the field name change to make existing
pygtk versions compile against 2.11.x ?

And is there any chance we could get a new tarball so we can release
GNOME 2.19.4?

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list   pygtk@daa.com.au
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/

Reply via email to