-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We use Glade exclusively for CANVAS (which I consider fairly large at this point). It's working well, even for very complex projects.
That said, there ARE some pretty annoying bugs - especially related to image paths which it will break for no reason. You'll end up cleaning it up by hand after using it sometimes. And the programming model is fantastic. We have multiple Glades for multiple devices. For the N800 (small handheld device) you can expose your UI as three big buttons and for real Linux machines you can expose it in all its complex crazy glory. It's great. I think we use Gazpacho for the N800 .glade creation now, but that's because the Maemo guys do I think. So have no fear. :> - -dave steve george wrote: > > > Saw the following text at http://www.exit1.org/Gtk2-Ex-FormFactory/ > > > "RAD tools like Glade are fine for small applications but not if > you want to have a consistent look and feel in bigger and modular > applications" > > Got me wondering, .. how do you all feel about using Glade for > large scale applications? > > Any other recommendations for 'frameworks or other' that help large > scale python application development? > > (Just started reading kiwi documentation, so already looking at > that) > > Steve _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing > list pygtk@daa.com.au > http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: > http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG7oFkB8JNm+PA+iURAuloAJ0bPjAT2beGFGswITR8p/ZQjl5TfgCfULyJ jB+yI0YVgCUqKkZa2sEAiUI= =KiqB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list pygtk@daa.com.au http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
