On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:57 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 15:30, John Stowers <john.stowers.li...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > It would be great if we could do a PyGtk stable release to align with > > the last gtk-2.0 release. I am happy to do this if no-one else wants to. > > I guess you should go for it.
OK great. It would be appreciated if someone could review this branch http://github.com/nzjrs/pygtk/compare/master...add-gtk-2.20-api It is the API additions for Gtk-2.20. It should be uncontroversial. I will push this in the next few days if no-one objects. > > > Also, would it be worth numbering this release as pygtk-2.22? It would > > be nice if the version numbers matched again. Although this might not be > > worth the effort if the pygobject version number != the glib version > > number. > > I'm open to changing pygobject's versioning scheme if it helps. OK cool. I will wait to see if anyone else voices an opinion first. John > > Regards, > > Tomeu > > > John > > > > _______________________________________________ > > python-hackers-list mailing list > > python-hackers-l...@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/python-hackers-list > > _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list pygtk@daa.com.au http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/