On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 10:45 -0700, Smartboy wrote: > Hello, > > I came across the PyGObject bindings today through the fedora mail > which was linked to on this list, and since have been wondering why it > isn't mentioned anywhere else. I think that a notice should be put > somewhere on the PyGTK site that there are now PyGObject bindings for > GTK which can be used as an alternative to the PyGTK bindings > themselves. They don't seem exactly ready yet but are still enough to > get started on testing it seems, and the more people that know about > it, the more people that will test it. So, does anyone know how has > the ability to edit the site? What do you all think?
Hi Smartboy, Yes, the developer story here is a bit of a mindf**k. The mailing list for the gobject-introspection based bindings is here [1]. You should also read the thread on ddl here [2]. John [1] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/python-hackers-list [2] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2010-August/msg00035.html > > Smartboy > > _______________________________________________ > pygtk mailing list pygtk@daa.com.au > http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk > Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/ _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list pygtk@daa.com.au http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://faq.pygtk.org/
