Hartmut Goebel píše v St 30. 11. 2011 v 11:05 +0100: > I personally prefer (and use) Scon which was already used in > PyInstaller > in former times. But would not mind using waf if it does the job, > too. > When choosing Scons I could provide the build-script, though. > > What do you think?
I second using waf (for consistency). Is this anything what should be done before moving to DVCS? Is it only about to replace the makefile? Or even rst2pdf and rst2html? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyInstaller" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller?hl=en.
