Am 06.06.2014 06:57, schrieb Joachim Metz: > He this is the default behavior on Windows for years, and you don't > have the same restriction there? > What's up with that? Who's being "insecure"?
Yes, this is the behaviour on Windows. But it is insecure, as one can see by all the Malware available for Windows. We have to support his on Windows, because MS is not able or willed to solve this problem. It is a burden of the past we have to live with. But Unix has a multi-user for decades. If some Linux-Vendors think, it is a good idea to downgrade this, I see no reason why we should support this crap. -- Schönen Gruß Hartmut Goebel Dipl.-Informatiker (univ), CISSP, CSSLP Information Security Management, Security Governance, Secure Software Development Goebel Consult, Landshut http://www.goebel-consult.de Blog: http://www.goebel-consult.de/blog/eine-millonen-aufkleber-fordern-asyl-fur-snowden Kolumne: http://www.cissp-gefluester.de/2012-09-steht-ein-manta-fahrer-vor-der-uni Goebel Consult ist Mitglied bei http://www.7-it.de/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
