I went ahead and prepared PR - https://github.com/pyinstaller/pyinstaller/pull/8662
I believe that the result patch is straightforward and reasonable. Thanks in advance for the consideration and review. Tomáš Čech Dne úterý 16. července 2024 v 15:00:24 UTC+2 uživatel Sleep Walker napsal: > 1) staticx doesn't support onedir mode and I have more utilities to pack - > having onefile would bloat the result a lot for no reason > 2) docker is not present dependency in my usecase > 3) rest of the code seems to be already ready for this scenario (but not > onedir mode on POSIX platform) > 4) fix is easy - just use the dynamic loader if it is already detected > > Would the patch be accepted? I imagine that the change like: > - linker_filename would be added to PYI_CONTEXT > - linker_filename would be filled if dynamic loader is used for call > (requires modification of function prototype so it can be filled in) > - if linker_filename is set, it would be used in > _pyi_main_handle_posix_onedir() > > Best regards, > > Tomáš Čech > > > Dne úterý 16. července 2024 v 14:30:14 UTC+2 uživatel bwoodsend napsal: > >> Any reason why you can't just use staticx or build on an old Docker >> container to make your application portable? I doubt anyone wants to >> support this case. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyInstaller" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pyinstaller/8e7a0789-ee2a-4be5-9da0-0cacc41af09en%40googlegroups.com.
