On Jan 20, 2012 10:17 PM, "lkcl luke" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 4:08 AM, C Anthony Risinger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > the barrier is a little high right now to deploy desktop apps ... > > maybe if a *COUGH* gobject port is possible, > > no. absolutely not. they fucked it up. if you want 100% CPU > utilisation, race conditions that will cause inexplicable crashes, as > well as incomplete (i.e. completely useless) functionality _and_ have > to do a hell of a lot of work, feel free to go ahead and explore that > space.
Heh sorry I know I know ... I have wanted to explore this ... but alas, so many other caves to explore ... in due time. No worries, the pythonwebkit stuff works great, but not sans a bit of a pain; judging by my last round of updates to the Archlinux package, it may fall out of working, for me at least. There were some tough bugs that took days to track, and I ended up pulling patches from upstream. ... would just be nice to have the facilities already available to (and enabled in) most distros. But hey, I'm not complaining! Don't think that for a second :-) Even though pyjd is normally deemed "for development of webapps", I actually think it's way cooler -- with much greater potential -- than the translator variant, *by far* ... hence my continued allure toward a long-lasting solution; preferably one not solely maintained by you, or anyone else, because that's a nontrivial task even for the rock stars among us. -- C Anthony
