On Jan 23, 2012 4:42 AM, "lkcl luke" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:56 AM, C Anthony Risinger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Mongrel2 might be used to handle https connections and could also > > actually having seen what mongrel2 actually is i'm massively > impressed by it. i love any kind of "goodbye apache, hello > short-and-sweet thing with a bit of python thrown in" thing.
I was actually a bit surprised to see Anthony in the uwsgi mailing list. I second the idea of using uwsgi and possibly Mongrel2. In my opinion, uwsgi is much like pyjamas (sod the documentation, and read the code--at least for C & C++ plugins). The only thing I can say about Mongrel2 at this time is my first config for the test instance of my project works (unlike apache which took a few days). Oh, I also like the fact that you can hang one app at '/' and later add more routes with '/blah' (and no need to change the original setup) -- try doing that with apache. --Jeff
