On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Peter Bittner <[email protected]> wrote: > Pascal, > > I've pushed some changes to the repository on SF, including the ones > from issue #607. I've also added Grafpad and Tickery to the list of > "Sites using Pyjamas". On Wikipedia's article about Pyjamas [1] I > found Nagare [2]. Is that also good to be included in the list? What > role does Pyjamas play in that framework? (Anybody who knows more > about it?)
oo i like nagare, conceptually it's superb. basically they took the pyjs 0.5 compiler as-is and fired it off, on-demand, using a decorator to identify code-blocks that would be compiled for client-side. it's brilliant: it means that the entire application - client-side code and server-side code - can be contained in one application... in python. and i think in debug mode (django debug mode) compilation is automatic if you modify a file. if it's not, it bloody well should be. yes, go for it: shove it in, somewhere, but make sure you say that it uses only the pyjs compiler, and only the pyjs compiler from version 0.5 of pyjamas [in some clear way that gets both points clearly across, but isn't so arsey as what i said] > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyjamas_(software) > [2] http://www.nagare.org/trac/wiki/NagareTutorial > >>> I believe a more promindent place for that section wouldn't harm. The >>> "About" page could just be fine, at the end of the page or before "Why >>> should I use Pyjamas?" > > Is it okay to leave the "Sites using Pyjamas" in the sidebar? if you think it's best put somewhere else knock yourself out >>> BTW, what is the preferred way for internal links? Isn't <a >>> href="#FAQ">... sufficient? Why is a schema such as <a >>> href="./FAQ.html#FAQ">... used all over the site? > > @Luke, can you clarify? i have nooo idea. probably because... oh wait, i know what it is: it's so that if you have javascript disabled, then despite there being no header on the pages (which the index.py application loads up using HTTPService) they're actually viewable and have the links etc. btw, peter, this isn't i-arsey, twitta, lynkdinn, faithbuhhk, aol or a pee aitch pee bee bee ess, can i therefore respectfully request that you use conventions suitable for a mailing list and drop that truly dreadful mind-twitching habit of inserting the "at" symbol in front of peoples' names? ... thanks :) l.
