On Jan 28, 2012 1:36 PM, "lkcl luke" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:58 PM, C Anthony Risinger <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:21 > > > > the modules we actually split into a gwt namespace in the belief it > > would be easier to stay in sync with upstream in the future. > > btw i'm getting fed up with advertising gwt within the pyjamas > codebase. i'd appreciate the library/gwt/* being removed.
I don't know if it's still valid from technical standpoint, but the idea was for it to be a pure translation of GWT. We *are* the python port of GWT. We have additional capabilities and our own translator ... but the API is 95% thanks to GOOG ... what's the prob acknowledging? We even encourage people to *blindly* translate GWT modules ;-) and "do not think, trust Google". idk, I think everyone deserves recognition of quality work, sponsored/free/libre/OSS/public/* software alike. I'd be against changing the name just to hide this fact ... unless technical reasons no longer apply (Kees probably knows best, I recall him saying auto translation is probably off the table). I think there is benefit in keeping a pristine GWT translation *somewhere*. -- C Anthony
