On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Michael Perkonigg <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26 Mar 2012 at 21:03, lkcl luke wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Michael Perkonigg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On 26 Mar 2012 at 10:57, Peter Bittner wrote: >> > >> >> Shouldn't we use the safe version of calculating the hypotenuse? >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypot >> > >> > Sounds reasonable. I have a diff for that too, want me to raise a new >> > issue, >> > reopen the old one (if that's possible) or forget it? >> >> reopen. > > I attached the diff file (against HEAD!) but cannot change the state of the > issue. > http://code.google.com/p/pyjamas/issues/detail?id=705
ok - can you please in future do a version which takes into account the fact that hypot already exists? in other words, you need to do a "git pull". i now am forced to hand-edit the file which makes extra work for me. l.
