On 26 Mar 2012 at 22:29, lkcl luke wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Michael Perkonigg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 26 Mar 2012 at 21:03, lkcl luke wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Michael Perkonigg <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > On 26 Mar 2012 at 10:57, Peter Bittner wrote: > >> > > >> >> Shouldn't we use the safe version of calculating the hypotenuse? > >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypot > >> > > >> > Sounds reasonable. I have a diff for that too, want me to raise a new > >> > issue, > >> > reopen the old one (if that's possible) or forget it? > >> > >> reopen. > > > > I attached the diff file (against HEAD!) but cannot change the state of the > > issue. > > http://code.google.com/p/pyjamas/issues/detail?id=705 > > ok - can you please in future do a version which takes into account > the fact that hypot already exists? in other words, you need to do a > "git pull". > > i now am forced to hand-edit the file which makes extra work for me.
Sorry. Will try to do that next time. I have to admit that I am not very familiar with git yet. It's sometimes hard to understand if you use SVN all the time. Mike > > l. -- Waage, Hahn, Haselbaum und Rabe
