On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 3:18 AM, pca <[email protected]> wrote: > > In fact, I'm not sure I'm going to use it, because I'm not clear on one > point : does the pyjs community want pyjs to be bleeding edge technology ? > Please check the definition of bleeding edge technology on wikipedia.
Pierre, we are cutting teeth at the moment ... both adjusting to and preparing for what may come, in addition to cleaning and repackaging what is past. there is still very much to do. for the most part, the libraries are already rather stable -- most of the focus ATM is improving the marketability and consistency of what we already have; this includes some refactoring and shuffling of existing code to make the toolchain simpler. to answer, we are both. the tech itself is rather unprecedented, but not fresh out the oven; we have many users running stable apps for years or more. the focus to improve stability is one of employing Continuous Integration servers and buildbots to run regression suites in an automated fashion. tools like Github and the like will make code review simpler, and increase transparency/awareness. these are all steps in motion now, but unlikely to really affect noticeably for at least 3-6 mo. my suggestion would be to simply try it out. if you encounter problems, there are many knowledgeable people around who can help ... and as a completely novice user, it would be fantastic if you'd record all barriers encountered, so they can be remedied in good time (sooner preferably). thanks, -- C Anthony
