2012/6/17 Maho <[email protected]>: > > I think, that it might be better, to start some kind of native API, like > wx-pyjamas or qt-pyjamas. I mean - when we use RootPanel(), it's wx.Window > in fact. When we use HorizontalPanel, it's wx.BoxSizer in fact , etc...
I second that. That would be real cross-platform (native _and_ browser-based) development. I'm wondering whether there's no-one who has ever attempted to do that in the past. However, I guess the point of pyjd is that there should theoretically be near no additional code for a (pseudo) native implementation, and the advantage of the Python stack trace in case of errors. A compatibility layer to wx or Qt would mean quite some code of course for every single widget. Peter
