I think then instead of rework just .. use the UI and write the fresh JavaScript code itself.. would be appropriate.. I guess
On Saturday, 6 October 2012 06:26:06 UTC+5:30, Lex Berezhny wrote: > > This will not be easily portable to javascript. > > At least not without significant changes. The fact that it uses > Twisted and thus async model is a plus. But you'll likely have to > implement a custom version of Twisted from scratch that works with the > browsers event model. Also, I believe Twisted uses more of Python than > Pyjs is able to understand. > > Same goes with OpenSSL. > > None of this stuff will compile directly without quite a bit of work > on your part. > > - lex > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:33 PM, drupin <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > no one yet? > > > > > > On Thursday, 4 October 2012 05:22:24 UTC+5:30, drupin wrote: > >> > >> qwebirc from qwebirc.org > >> > >> the dependencies are > >> > >> python python-twisted python-twisted-bin python-twisted-core > >> python-twisted-runner python-twisted-names python-twisted-mail > >> python-twisted-words python-twisted-web python-zope.interface > python-openssl > >> > >> is it possible to port to java script and then can be chrome packeged > >> apps.... > >> > >> drupin @ freenode > > > > -- > > > > > > > --
