Perhaps not abandoned, but it seems to be "somnolescent" (sleeping).
I don't mind -- I am trying to learn other libraries.  As it is
right now, you can do a lot with pyjs.  But I don't see it moving
into new areas, such as richer widgets -- perhaps things are happening
that I don't see.

On 12/18/2012 10:08 AM, Lex Berezhny wrote:
I don't think the project is going to be abandoned anytime soon. Quite a
few people depend on it.

I don't really understand your CSS requirements. Why do you want to
dynamically inject the CSS? The complexity introduced in that seems
unnecessary. What is the goal or reason for this?


On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Łukasz Mach <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    W dniu 16.12.2012 19:56, Lex Berezhny pisze:

        Instead of having pyjs compiler call other build system
        components it
        makes a lot more sense to have a Makefile that calls pyjs and
        whatever
        else you need.


    What I want is to make all widgets to be CSSed and themed out of the
    box. That's why I think that using custom makefile(or something like
    that) is not good way of doing it.

    Especially, when you use builtin widgets (like calendar, datefield
    or sth) and you need to iterate over them to grab information about
    css used.

    I wanted to do it in way, that CSS is injected into browser after
    first usage of widget, but C Anthony was very against twice.


    And OT and side question is also important: should I worry about
    project? In last weeks I see so low traffic on list, that I'm afraid
    that some day all my projects will be written in framework which is
    not maintained by anyone ...



    --
    pozdrawiam

    Łukasz Mach - [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    --




--




--



Reply via email to