What s the difference between the pyjaco and the pyjs compilers.

>From what I can read on the various blogs, the pyjs compiler is more full 
>featured but I hear has whole laundry list of problems one of the bloggers had 
>posted. He had also compared other alternatives as well.

I also notice that pyjaco was listed as much better than the pyjs compiler in 
these areas.

Plus pyjaco seems to be active development.

I understand pyjamas is much more than just the pyjs compiler.

Questions:
    1. Does pyjaco generate more efficient in speed and size?
    2. Can the pyjaco compiler replace the pyjs compiler and if not what would 
be missing. That would leave pyjamas to focus on the gwt widget sets in python 
as well as pyjd. Does this make sense.
    3. As of now the pyjs tool and widgets set produces very large JavaScript 
code. Someone mentioned 30M for hello world program uncompressed. What are the 
root causes for this bloat and is there any work happening in this area.

Why do I ask. 
   1. I plan to use pyjamas and/or pyjaco and find this approach to development 
exciting.
    2. I have a very small budget that I plan to use for improvements to the 
toolset. In my opinion on things like efficiency of the generated code as well 
as gwt version upgrade. And have junior a engineer from India that I am funding 
that I was thinking of assigning to this task. Don't expect magic from him, he 
is know Luke or Kees Bos but I expect him to learn and contribute in whatever 
way possible.

Thanks
Sarvi

-- 



Reply via email to