On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 20:58 -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Lex Berezhny <[email protected]> > wrote: > You are right, I meant to say anonymous functions. > > > I think it's a shame that Guido refuses to add this. Almost > all modern languages have anonymous functions. It's almost a > standard when you are dealing with frameworks and environments > that require callbacks. > > > there really isn't anything about python's impl (or lack thereof, if > you wish) that makes it any more/less useful than what you get from > JS/Ruby etc; the concept of an "anonymous function" is really just > that, a function that does not have an implicit name, but beyond that, > it's just a function like any other. > > > personally, i would agree with Guido in that python *doesn't* need > them
I'm also not impressed by the introduction of anon funcs in dart (as opposed to python). I do really miss the idea of a yield statement in dart (and if I'm correct, the idea of generators in general). On the other hand, the idea of isolators is interesting (esp. in a browser context). -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pyjs.org Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
