On 10/08/2013 05:23 AM, Łukasz Mach wrote:
I agree with Lex that maybe pyjs (compiler) should be separated from
pyjamas (widget library), but I also believe that widget library is
essential, and is thing which will attract more users and more developers.
I agree that a separation might be a good idea. That said,
the widget library, while useful as it is, needs work.
And additional thought: I think that pyjd is dead end. Thing which:
works on Windows, but doesn't work on Debian, works on Ubuntu but
requires downloading some library and compiling it yourself, I don't
believe any of my app users would do such things ...
Having ability to run application cross browser/desktop is very useful,
but I think it should use toolkits like Qt or wxPython (so some of
pyjamas classes would be wrappers on qt/wx classes, in desktop mode).
I completely agree with all this (had it in my message but edited it ;).
To me pyjd has been something of an "emperor's new clothes" thing --
like ... really??
Steve
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pyjs.org Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
