In order to get people to consider it for new projects pyjs needs to support Python 3.
At this time even Python 2 is not fully supported. To get pyjs to fully support Python 3 would be a big effort. On Jun 10, 2016 10:38 AM, "Mark Lockett" <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been using PYJS quite a bit for projects over the last two years. I > find it's great until you hit a problem of something that is available in > normal Python but not in PYJS. I have had this happen with defaultdict and > SHA256. > > I'm not so sure that PYJS needs full time work, even small contributions > would be useful. > > Mark > > On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 3:53:08 AM UTC+8, Adrien wrote: >> >> On 09/06/2016 21:43, Lex Berezhny wrote: >> > As a purely volunteer project the scope of pyjs is too great. Someone >> > would have to get hired by a company that will pay them to work on pyjs >> > at least part time for serious progress to be made. >> > >> > Hoping won't accomplish anything. >> >> I do agree with you and I hope (*) that you didn't feel offended. I was >> expressing what I believe is a realistic point of view, but not to say >> "this should be done" - it is self understood that whatever people do as >> volunteers is more than what we have to expect from them :) >> >> >> (*) again... I may hope too much! >> > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pyjs.org Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pyjs.org Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
