On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:34:36PM -0600, William Ferrell wrote:
> On 4/17/06, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah... as I say, I think that's why they didn't allow people to
> > actually put it on as text: that would be *much* easier to extract.
> >
> > But if you run your X server at 640x480, full screen, things ought to
> > work out just fine -- and quite a bit faster.
> 
> Actually I think there's a less nefarious reason behind this (occam's
> razor, and all that) -- producing a graphics chip with far less
> computing horsepower and fewer features than an 8-bit NES is *way*
> cheaper than one that would have to do the graphics stuff, handle
> timing, *and* draw actual letters.

You think?   Hmm... Never really considered it.

I think it might have been a push; when did CD+G hit?

> You'd have to offer up different fonts, styles, etc., and send strings
> and timing info along to the chip instead of simple graphic
> instructions. The way it's done now, you can use whatever visual style
> you like as long as it can fit in the low-bandwidth constraints of the
> CD+G format.

Yeah, but is that effect, or cause?  :-)

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer                          Baylink                             RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates        The Things I Think                        '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA      http://baylink.pitas.com             +1 727 647 1274

     A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
     Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? 
     
     A: Top-posting.
     Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Pykaraoke-discuss mailing list
Pykaraoke-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pykaraoke-discuss

Reply via email to