Excerpts from Danny Navarro's message of Thu Dec 30 16:33:02 -0300 2010: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Mariano Mara <[email protected]> wrote: > > Excerpts from Marius Gedminas's message of Thu Dec 30 15:55:33 -0300 2010: > >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 01:41:45AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote: > >> > I've been ignoring the fact that WebOb has very light test coverage for > >> > a while now, but I've just run into a bug that makes it clear that my > >> > blissful head-in-the-sand days are nearing an end. > >> > > >> > Is anyone interested in leading a task to give WebOb 100% test coverage? > >> > It's a fairly large task, inglorious, and boring, but straightforward > >> > and will help *lots* of people inside and outside the Pylons community. > >> > > >> > If so, please respond here. > >> > >> I wouldn't mind giving this a push, if time permits. > >> > >> The upstream repository is https://bitbucket.org/ianb/webob/. I suppose > >> we should submit patches via bitbucket pull requests? > >> > >> Marius Gedminas > > > > That's how I did it so I hope you're right. I already added tests for > > webob.html_escape and webob.datetime_utils and I'm working on > > webob.cookies right now [1]. > > > > Would you like to lead and distribute the workload? It would be great so > > we can prevent duplication of effort. > > Count with me for the distribution of workload. > > I would need some canonical examples of how you want to write the > tests. I guess we are talking about writing unit tests with unittest > instead of extending the current doctests.
As far as I can tell from the original tests, nose.tools is the weapon of choice. Besides the tests Gael provided, I don't see unittest in use. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en.
