On Oct 9, 2006, at 9:36 PM, Ian Bicking wrote: > This has come up before. Should url_for have a fully_qualified > keyword > argument to do this?
Yup, it should, its in the Routes trac as a ticket now. > This could potentially go in PrefixMiddleware, as another kind of > fixup > of an incoming proxied request. > > It's occurred to me that really proxies could (and should) just retain > the original Host header. But the kind of proxying people do for web > frameworks never does. Why is that? Yea, it is pretty bizzare. I'd think prefix middleware should handle fixing that up as well. Cheers, Ben --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
