Ben Bangert wrote:
POST might be used for simple kinds of updates -- e.g., increment a
counter -- or other kinds of control situations. It's not
particularly unRESTful IMHO.
I was referring to using a POST against a member resource. Not POST in
general. Of course, who knows if the Restafarians would consider WebDAV
a RESTful service. The REST religion has many branches, they don't
always agree. :)
I believe the guy who coined "REST" was one of the authors of the WebDAV
spec. And I think it's a good enough spec. But the use of GET in
WebDAV sucks royally, and it's something noticeable in other REST
practices too -- they don't leave enough room for UI (aka web applications).
--
Ian Bicking | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://blog.ianbicking.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
