For what is worth, we (which mostly means Mariana) are putting a lot
of effort on porting our apps to use Pylons (and I've been bugging the
list with a few questions :-). A few comments from that perspective:

On 1/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

(...)

1. Hosting possibilities - not to many...
---------------------------------------------
(...)


That is not an issue for us (we host things on our machines here,
blablabla). But I understand our situation is not common.



2. Documentation
--------------------------------------------
More docs and in a more friendly layout. In Django to start working
with databases user needs to check two pages - "Creating models",
"The database API " which explain in a nice way how to use that
part of the framework.  For this example a Pylons only SQLAlchemy
tutorial would be required (how to add,edit,delete,search, how to make
complex queries, how to create models).
The docs layout could be like django/djangoo book - explain one
feature at a time, no SQLAlchemy + Myghty + Helpers + FooSomething at
once. Lolish examples with print's are very good for learning. Move
tips from mailing list to the site.


Well, this is actually interesting. When we started (about 9 months
ago?), one of the reasons we decided to go with Pylons was that it
looked like the docs were actually better and the info easier to find
(yes, we did look at TG and Django, among several others). We haven't
really compared again after we plunged into Pylons. However, yes,
certainly the docs can be very much improved (e.g., just in the last
couple of days, Mariana has found a solution to a problem not from a
Pylons doc, but from a Ruby on Rails doc, and extrapolating from
there).


(I just read Mike Orr's comments; I see his points, but to those of us
who are not really web-based apps. hackers the situation can sometimes
be _very_ frustrating. That said, though, we still think Pylons is
really awesome).



3. Promotion
-------------------------------------------
Django writes a book, Django on PyCon, everyone talks about Django ;)
There is a lot of small and bigger Django apps (Check google code).
Pylons can also use some more aggressive promotion - if someone wants
to make a CMS app and ask about it on the mailing lists - no Zope but
"use Pylons"... Blog about Pylons, new tutorials, new events (like
new hosting company etc.) put them on aggregates like python planet.
Try to digg them.


Our moving to pylons is far from complete, but (some of) our stuff is here:

https://launchpad.net/asterias-pylons



Best,


R.


>



--
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
Statistical Computing Team
Structural Biology and Biocomputing Programme
Spanish National Cancer Centre (CNIO)
http://ligarto.org/rdiaz

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to