On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Gustavo Narea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, you are wrong, as Gael pointed in the previous message. Come on, there's > no such a problem with repoze.who. Gael said that you can change cookie name. That's OK. Problem is different. Do you really even understand the problem?
> Based on the your statements on this thread, I'd say you barely read the > repoze.who documentation. Yes, I have read the source code and tried to understand it, compare and etc. Isn't that better? >> It looks like you are the person who understands something here. Could >> you explain to me why this division into components is good? Why is it >> not enough WSGI for this task? > > Whatever you say. This is turning into an endless debate with the same > arguments on both sides -- you vs. everybody else. Ad hominem. I'm just looking for the answers. If my questions makes you doubt in what you believe that's your problem not mine. I repeat my question not arguments. -- Dalius http://blog.sandbox.lt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
